Preview of Nocturne in C# minor (1830) …an analysis

Analysis of these measures with traditional theory might look like the line below.  Note that functions I, IV, etc are combined with identities, Im, VI#6, and VM.  ‘VI#6’ is particularly disturbing since its identity is not given, only the function ‘#6’.  An ‘augmented-six’ chord is a ‘dominant’[1], and since it doesn’t fall on ‘V’ it should be regarded as a ‘secondary dominant’, according to the theory.

If it were to be designated as a ‘secondary dominant’ it might look like the line below.  However, this doesn’t do the trick because an ‘augmented-six’ chord isn’t a ‘dominant-seventh’…or is it?[2] Note that the root, ‘A’ in the second measure above is simply an inversion of the super-tonic, ‘D-sharp’ in the second measure below as they share the same notes in the treble, albeit with different functions.

To read this analysis in its entirety, please purchase and download by clicking the button below.


[1] In addition, the word ‘dominant’ has only one definition in a musical sense, that of the fifth note of a scale. Period.  There is no contrasting definition.  (see two definitions of ‘dominant’).

[2] To help the reader understand the resolution to this problem, refer please to ‘The Tritone Its Function’.

Please follow and like The Piano Professor:
RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Visit Us
YouTube
YouTube
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.